"This matter of linkages is crucial. The discuss..."

https://arbital.com/p/9pt

by Dil Green Jul 9 2019


This matter of linkages is crucial. The discussion above seems vague.

To be clear - a 'Tree' inheritance diagram can only map simplistic domains.

To be useful in 'useful to humans' domains - governance, economics, science (let alone politics, art, philosophy), we must be able to map any connection at all: - "A City is not a Tree".

I understand that Arbital is math focused - math is a simplistic domain - one where proof is a binary and immutable condition - and yet a single 'proof' can be related to multiple domains (both 'upwards' and 'downwards').

So I may be in the wrong place. I'd like to know if this is the case.

PS: Based on this quote that popped up; "Truth is singular, its versions are mistruths", I may indeed be in the wrong place. Or Truths is a rather small set, that is mostly full of banalities (at least, once identified and accepted).