Logarithm base 1

https://arbital.com/p/log_base_1

by Nate Soares Jun 6 2016 updated Sep 15 2016

There is no log base 1.


[summary: There is no Logarithm base 1, because no matter how many times you multiply 1 by 1, you get 1. If there were a log base 1, it would send 1 to 0 (because logb(1)=0 for every b), and it would also send 1 to 1 (because logb(b)=1 for every b), which demonstrates some of the difficulties with log1. In fact, it would need to send 1 to every number, because log(11)=log(1)+log(1) and so on. And it would need to send every x>1 to , and every 0<x<1 to , and those aren't numbers, so there's no logarithm base 1.

But if there was, it would be a [-multifunction] with values in the [extended_reals extended real numbers]. This is actually a perfectly valid way to define log1, though doing so is not necessarily a good idea.]

There is no Logarithm base 1, because no matter how many times you multiply 1 by 1, you get 1. If there were a log base 1, it would send 1 to 0 (because logb(1)=0 for every b), and it would also send 1 to 1 (because logb(b)=1 for every b), which demonstrates some of the difficulties with log1. In fact, it would need to send 1 to every number, because log(11)=log(1)+log(1) and so on. And it would need to send every x>1 to , and every 0<x<1 to , and those aren't numbers, so there's no logarithm base 1.

But if you really want a logarithm base 1, you can define log1 to be a multifunction from [positiverealnumebrs R+] to R{,}. On the input 1 it outputs R. On every input x>1 it outputs {}. On every input 0<x<1 it outputs {}. This multifunction can be made to satisfy all the basic properties of the logarithm, if you interpret = as , 1{} as the [interval_notation interval] (1,), and 1{} as the interval (0,1). For example, 0log1(1), 1log1(1), and log1(1)+log1(1)log1(11). 7log1(17), and 151log1(15). This is not necessarily the best idea ever, but hey, the [complex_log final form] of the logarithm was already a multifunction, so whatever. See also [log_is_a_multifunction].

While you're thinking about weird logarithms, see also Log base infinity.