Ordered ring

https://arbital.com/p/ordered_ring

by Dylan Hendrickson Jul 6 2016 updated Jul 7 2016

A ring with a total ordering compatible with its ring structure.


[summary: An ordered ring is a Ring that is totally ordered, where the ordering agrees with the ring operations. In particular, adding something to two elements doesn't change which of them is bigger, and the product of two [-positive] elements is positive.]

An ordered ring is a Ring R=(X,,) with a total order compatible with the ring structure. Specifically, it must satisfy these axioms for any a,b,cX:

An element a of the ring is called "[-positive]" if 0<a and "[-negative]" if a<0. The second axiom, then, says that the product of nonnegative elements is nonnegative.

An ordered ring that is also a field is an Ordered field.

Basic Properties

%%hidden(Show proof): First suppose a0. Using the first axiom to add a to both sides, a+(a)=0a. For the other direction, suppose 0a. Then aa+a=0. %%

%%hidden(Show proof): Suppose a and b are nonpositive elements of R, that is a,b0. From the first axiom, a+(a)=0a, and similarly 0b. By the second axiom 0ab. But ab=ab, so 0ab. %%

%%hidden(Show proof): Let a be such an element. Since the ordering is total, either 0a or a0. In the first case, the second axiom gives 0a2. In the second case, the previous property gives 0a2, since a is nonpositive. Either way we have 0a2. %%

%%hidden(Show proof): Clearly 1=11. So 1 is a square, which means it's nonnegative. %%

Examples

The real numbers are an ordered ring (in fact, an Ordered field), as is any [-subring] of R, such as [4zq Q].

The complex numbers are not an ordered ring, because there is no way to define the order between 0 and i. Suppose that 0i, then, we have 0i×i=1, which is false. Suppose that i0, then 0=i+(i)0+(i), but then we have 0(i)×(i)=1, which is again false. Alternatively, i2=1 is a square, so it must be nonnegative; that is, 01, which is a contradiction.