Group

https://arbital.com/p/group_mathematics

by Nate Soares May 9 2016 updated Dec 31 2016

The algebraic structure that captures symmetry, relationships between transformations, and part of what multiplication and addition have in common.


[summary: A group is an abstraction of a collection of symmetries of an object. The collection of symmetries of a triangle (rotating by 120 or 240 degrees and flipping), rearrangements of a collection of objects (permutations), or rotations of a sphere, are all examples of groups.

A group abstracts from these examples by forgetting what the symmetries are symmetries of, and only considers how symmetries behave.

Note that it is not necessarily the case that the operation is commutative. Flipping and then rotating a triangle will give different symmetry than rotating and then flipping. If it is commutative, then the group is called abelian. ]

[summary(technical): A group G is a pair (X,) where X is a set and is a operation obeying the following laws:

  1. Closure: The operation is a function. For all x,y in* X, xy is defined and in X. We abbreviate xy as xy.
  2. Associativity: x(yz)=(xy)z for all x,y,zX.
  3. Identity: There is an element e such that xe=ex=x for all xX.
  4. [-inverse_element Inverses]: For each x in X, there is an element x1X such that xx1=x1x=e.

The operation need not be commutative, but if it is then the group is called abelian. ]

A group is an abstraction of a collection of symmetries of an object. The collection of symmetries of a triangle (rotating by 120 or 240 degrees and flipping), rearrangements of a collection of objects (permutations), or rotations of a sphere, are all examples of groups. A group abstracts from these examples by forgetting what the symmetries are symmetries of, and only considers how symmetries behave.

A group G is a pair (X,) where:

1) The set X is the collection of abstract symmetries that this group represents. "Abstract," because these elements aren't necessarily symmetries of something, but almost all examples will be.

2) The operation is the abstract composition operation.

3) The axiom of closure is redundant, since is defined as a function G×GG, but it is useful to emphasize this, as sometimes one can forget to check that a given subsets of symmetries of an object is closed under composition.

4) The axiom of identity says that there is an element e in G that is a do-nothing symmetry: If you apply to e and x, then simply returns x. The identity is unique: Given two elements e and z that satisfy axiom 2, we have ze=ez=z. Thus, we can speak of "the identity" e of G. This justifies the use of e in the axiom of inversion: axioms 1 through 3 ensure that e exists and is unique, so we can reference it in axiom 4.

e is often written 1 or 1G, because is often treated as an analog of multiplication on the set X, and 1 is the multiplicative identity. (Sometimes, e.g. in the case of rings, is treated as an analog of addition, in which case the identity is often written 0 or 0G.)

5) The axiom of inverses says that for every element x in X, there is some other element y that treats like the opposite of x, in the sense that xy=e and vice versa. The inverse of x is usually written x1, or sometimes (x) in cases where is analogous to addition.

6) The axiom of associativity says that \bullet behaves like composition of functions. When composing a bunch of functions, it doesn't matter what order the individual compositions are computed in. When composing f, g, and h, we can compute gf, and then compute h(gf), or we can compute hg and then compute (hg)f, and we will get the same result.

%%%knows-requisite(Monoid): Equivalently, a group is a monoid which satisfies "every element has an inverse". %%%

%%%knows-requisite(Category theory): Equivalently, a group is a category with exactly one object, which satisfies "every arrow has an inverse"; the arrows are viewed as elements of the group. This justifies the intuition that groups are collections of symmetries. The object of this category can be thought of an abstract object that the isomorphisms are symmetries of. A functor from this category into the category of sets associates this object with a set, and each of the morphisms a permutation of that set. %%%

Examples

The most familiar example of a group is perhaps (Z,+), the integers under addition. To see that it satisfies the group axioms, note that:

  1. (a) Z is a set, and (b) + is a function of type Z×ZZ
  2. (x+y)+z=x+(y+z)
  3. 0+x=x=x+0
  4. Every element x has an inverse x, because x+(x)=0.

For more examples, see the examples page.

Notation

Given a group G=(X,), we say "X forms a group under ." X is called the underlying set of G, and is called the group operation.

xy is usually abbreviated xy.

G is generally allowed to substitute for X when discussing the group. For example, we say that the elements x,yX are "in G," and sometimes write "x,yG" or talk about the "elements of G."

The order of a group, written |G|, is the size |X| of its underlying set: If X has nine elements, then |G|=9 and we say that G has order nine.

Resources

Groups are a ubiquitous and useful algebraic structure. Whenever it makes sense to talk about symmetries of a mathematical object, or physical system, groups pop up. For a discussion of group theory and its various applications, refer to the group theory page.

A group is a monoid with inverses, and an associative [algebraic_loop loop]. For more on how groups relate to other algebraic structures, refer to the tree of algebraic structures.


Comments

Qiaochu Yuan

Some of the aliases and stuff around groups have been using the term "algebraic group"; this has a different technical meaning in mathematics and should be avoided.